Tuesday, March 15, 2005

Daily Dozen - 3/15/2005

Why Rathergate and Easongate Are Still Open - If the mainstream media can't investigate their own screw-ups, no wonder they don't understand why the public increasingly doesn't trust them to investigate anything. By Thomas H. Lipscomb, Editor and Publisher


Calif. Judge Strikes Down Ban on Same-Sex Marriage
By Randy Hall, CNSNews.com

GOP sees momentum in ending judicial filibusters By Charlie Savage, Boston Globe

Scalia Slams 'Living Constitution' Theory Fox News, AP


Doubt aired on safety of Boston's I-93 tunnels - Engineer cites leaks, damage, lack of data
By Sean P. Murphy and Raphael Lewis, Boston Globe

Which Privileges for Islam? By Daniel Pipes, FrontPageMagazine.com

Supreme Court 5 runs roughshod over will of the people By Phyllis Schlafly, townhall.com

Democratic Thoughts Run Through the Arab Land - Youssef Ibrahim, Gulf News

China's course parallels old Germany's By James P. Pinkerton, Newsday.com

U.S. Youth Need History Lesson in Freedom Of The Press - K. Parker, USA Today

Buy Off Churchill Now to Save CU - Paul Campos, Rocky Mountain News

Anti-War Left Still Standing In Freedom's Way - Amir Taheri, The Australian

1 comment:

wanda said...

You can't really believe that ending the right to a judicial fillibuster is a positive thing. You do realize that would mean republicans would officially control ALL aspects of government. Of 241 judicial nominees only 10 were struck down during Bush's last term. Do you want the man to have blanket approval on nominee he suggests?
Keep in mind NO political party stays in control forever. The damage they do now WILL come back to haunt them in the future. This would be a serious mistake.
Wanda ( Words on A Page)
Speaking of the media and screw-ups, why haven't we heard more on Jeff Gannon/Guckert? That was a major screw-up and not just by the media! Of course he's on the team that sets the standards but doesn't feel the need to adhere to them.
I agree the Supremes are out of control. We need someone appointed with a more open-minded view who will stick to the idea that their job is to interpret the law not create their own version of it.